This issue is in a very collective: a subcommunity described by tags with relevant written content and authorities. The Overflow Weblog
" This is not always a bug—the truth is, some really hairy low-level algorithms try this on intent—nevertheless it ought to frequently be prevented. @Steve Gury give's a superb example of when it'd be a challenge.
When a local branch has an "upstream department" configured for it, it will eventually by default pull from and push to that remote branch. A local branch which has an "upstream department" set on it is often called a "tracking branch", so it's easy to confuse with distant-monitoring branches due to the very similar terminology.
You'll be wanting not less than a naive stemming algorithm (try the Porter stemmer; you will find readily available, cost-free code in the majority of languages) to procedure text 1st. Keep this processed textual content plus the preprocessed textual content in two individual Room-split arrays.
And that means you certainly don't want to check on each compose When the filename continue to exists, but you could be creating to the filesystem locale that will likely be unreachable When you release the filedescriptor
If you would like Verify that a file exists prior to deciding to attempt to examine it, and you may be deleting it after which you can you could be applying a number of threads or procedures, or An additional method understands about that file and could delete it - you chance the possibility of a race affliction when you Test it exists, since you are then racing
The w+ method Alternatively also enables studying and read more crafting but it truncates the file (if no these kinds of file exists - a different file is made). In case you are asking yourself the way it is achievable to go through from the truncated file, the looking through approaches can be used to browse the newly published file (or even the vacant file).
Applying scandir() in lieu of listdir() can appreciably boost the performance of code that also demands file type or file attribute information and facts, mainly because os.DirEntry objects expose this information Should the operating process gives it when scanning a Listing.
Remote pruning is not essential should you deleted the remote department. It is really only utilised to obtain the most up-to-day controllers accessible on a repository you happen to be tracking. I've noticed git fetch will add fobs, not eliminate them. Here is an illustration of when git distant prune origin will in fact do anything:
Notice: On the other hand, this strategy will never lock the file in any way and therefore your code can become prone to "time of Verify to time of use" (
Here is the use scenario you describe: Checking no matter if anything is inside a listing or not. As you are aware of, You should utilize the in read more operator for that:
To specify the specified mother or father, works by using the -m flag. As git can't select which guardian will be the mainline and and that is the department to un-merge immediately, so this have to be specified.
It is possible to cleanse up that info regionally like this: git remote prune origin Your neighborhood copies of deleted branches are not removed by this. Precisely the same result is achieved by making use of git fetch --prune
way to uncover an element in an inventory". And the main remedy on the question is basically comprehensive in all Python strategies to do this.